2024 the best apocalypse movies review
Price: $14.99 - $9.72
(as of Dec 04, 2024 06:32:11 UTC - Details)
From Roland Emmerich, director of THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW and INDEPENDENCE DAY, comes the ultimate action-adventure film; a thrill-ride of human survival, exploding with groundbreaking special effects. Starring John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Woody Harrelson and Danny Glover.
Aspect Ratio : 2.40:1
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
MPAA rating : PG-13 (Parents Strongly Cautioned)
Product Dimensions : 0.7 x 7.5 x 5.4 inches; 1.6 ounces
Audio Description: : English
Item model number : 6639435
Director : Roland Emmerich
Media Format : Dolby, NTSC, Subtitled, Color, Widescreen, Dubbed, Blu-ray, AC-3
Run time : 2 hours and 38 minutes
Release date : March 2, 2010
Actors : John Cusack, Thandie Newton, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Oliver Platt
Dubbed: : French
Subtitles: : English, French
Producers : Aaron Boyd, Harald Kloser, Kirstin Winkler, Larry J. Franco, Marc Weigert
Studio : Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
ASIN : B0032KNA4I
Writers : Roland Emmerich, Harald Kloser
Number of discs : 1
Reviewer: Midge
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title: Excellent! Edge of your seat Thriller!!
Review: SPOILERS throughout!I don't know what movie the rest of these brain-fried people saw. I'm sure glad I watched the movie before reading their 3rd grade diatribes.This was one of the most excellent, thrilling, action-packed disaster movies I've ever seen. There's not a boring moment in the entire movie and has you on the edge of your seat every moment.It was a pleasure to finally see a disaster movie which is truly packed with disasters destroying the entire planet and every identifiable landmark instead of wasting time with ridiculous side stories. Most of the movie is through the viewpoint of global scientists, leaders and the struggle of one family to survive. I watched it for the disaster storyline, not their personal stories. When people complain about the lack of depth for the family, this is a disaster movie, not Sleepless in Seattle. If they had spent a lot of time on the personal issues of families, it would have ruined the movie and impeded the flow of suspense.I'm thankful they kept to the main core of the plot "The destruction of the Earth!" The entire movie was a fresh concept for global destruction. I was surprised to learn that these were not spaceships... although I think that would have been neat as well. However, it did not make as much sense for the two leaders which stayed behind, as it might have made if these had been interplanetary vehicles.While I understand the concept that no gov't would inform the population of such a cataclysmic event due to global panic and violence which would ensue from the very type of people who wrote those ridiculous critiques... many could have survived via ships or high altitudes if they had known planetary flooding was the main issue.You can also bet the wealthy, famous and chosen few would be the ones to get the seats. It isn't pretty, but unfortunately, realistic (as was the elimination of anyone who threatened to spill the beans). However, I doubt the escape ships would have all been in China. Each country would have had their own assembled at their respective black ops sites, under their control.It was obvious the person in charge of the plane flight scenes had no knowledge of aerodynamics or piloting. Planes simply cannot fly like that and would have stalled and crashed within minutes. However, it did not make it any less exciting. Having had about the same amount of flying skills, I did share Gordon's horrific predicament at being expected to fly a plane he had never trained for. That part was realistic but I doubt he would have managed that well under those conditions (not even in a simulator). However, it didn't dampen the excitement of the scenes.Same with the unbelievable driving escape scenes where no vehicle could survive the bizarre destruction sequences. Yet, no less exciting even though we knew it was over the top. We were still on the edge of our seats all the way.On the "divorced family being saved by the part time dad" issue... that has been overused from movies like Day after Tomorrow and War of the Worlds, so the theme is too repetitious as is the bratty kid routine which was also used in the Day the Earth Stood still. So, on this subject, these directors and writers do need to get away from these overused themes. In this film, would have opted to save Gordon in this scenario since he was the one who earned the family's love & respect.You can also bet that the cell phones and electricity would not be working and there would have been in a lot more global panic. However, our beloved media & political circus would have certainly been making jokes chastising everyone for making a big deal out of nothing (as depicted) while the planet was disintegrating beneath their feet. Have to keep the masses calm no matter what.The officials also seemed to be unreasonably blind as to what was occurring globally when they had access to hundreds of orbiting satellite systems. It took these survivors a month to find out that one of the continents had not flooded, (despite the supertech ops center they had?) As a director, I would have opted to flood all of the continents. I would not have left any landmass untouched because that really changed the dynamics.I would also have also opted for a simple discovery of the father alive on his ship & his rescue without the alternate ending discourse dialogue. Tsunami's are not as bad at sea as they are near a coast. At sea, they are swells, not waves, so it is likely large ships out at deep sea would have faired quite well. The film's research on realistic effects of cataclysmic occurrences was a bit thin.Opening the gates of the ships at the last moment was in poor judgment. If they had done so earlier, it would have been ok, but to wait until the tidal wave was on the way was most definitely not the smartest thing to do with humanity at stake.It would have been better with the President all the way to the end of the movie. The Secret Service would not have left him under any circumstances despite any protest he might have made. He would have never been out of their sight and they would have taken him by force if necessary to save him and the continuity of gov't. I think this should have been handled quite differently than it was. I did not agree with the fate of this character. He should have been a survivor and an inspiration to the survivors.Even with these improvements I would have opted for, I still loved the movie. It was a great disaster film!Don't listen to these brain-fried low brows that were probably dragged away from their favorite sports game and beer, etc., by their families and forced to watch the movie. Their lack of education and mentality is obvious just by reading their mindless attempts to attack the director and film to get revenge for missing their favorite TV sports; It was obvious just by the time of year and date this film was released. The reviews improved as soon as football season was over. That should tell you something about the hostility & validity of those holiday reviews.Think for yourself. If you enjoy action packed disaster movies, you will love this movie. It outdoes any disaster movie ever made. If you are looking for soapy relationships... then perhaps Sleepless in Seattle is a better choice for you. If you are looking for info on the Mayans & 2012... then you should look for documentaries with that info. But this is not for thin-skinned picayune whiners who are impossible to please.This movie is for people who love disaster and action movies. The scientific concept of this disaster is fresh and original. The director does a great job of destroying every famous landmark and anticipated trouble spot across the planet. You get to see California fall into the ocean; the Yellowstone Caldera in a magnificent explosion; Hawaii buried in lava; the Sistine Chapel crumbling into dust around the masses; the Las Vegas casino's disintegrating magnificently; the destruction of Brazil's landmarks; Washington DC in ruins; California skyscrapers crashing around their ears; incredible tsunami's miles high... covering every coast on the globe; continents tearing apart into horrific chasms taking everything of civilization down with it. You can't ask for more than this movie has to offer in disasters. A refreshing change from all those movies where they usually save civilization in the nick of time. Not this one. They utterly destroy it along with a majority of the population, in full realistic "top of the line" effects!This is by far the best disaster movie ever made with the most fantastic effects you could ever hope for. It is truly like riding the world's scariest roller coaster for almost 3 hours. You are on the edge of your seat throughout the entire movie. Not a boring moment. The tension is tight from start to finish and will twist you into knots without a chance to catch your breath. There are no pauses between the action and constant tension. The bigger the screen, the better you will appreciate the experience. This ultimate disaster movie is indeed all about the fantastic special effects. They did not scrimp on any of them.You will not be disappointed if you love disaster movies crammed with global destruction and special effects. This film outdoes any disaster movie ever made.
Reviewer: Isiah Taylor
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title: A Blockbuster That Deserves A Place in in the Realm of the Classic!!
Review: Whoa! Where do I begin??My name is Isiah and I'm from Tallahassee, Florida and I am telling you that we need to ADD a certain movie to our hall a classics; classics where even today, they give us pause with their messages, themes, story lines, and sometimes, special effects. One of these movies, based on my humble opinion, should be the Roland Emmerich's film-the Mother of Disaster Films, the film that ended the 2000s with a bang..."2012"!! Roland Emmerich was born in 1955 in Germany and is well known massive disaster movies such as "Independence Day" (1996), "Godzilla" (1998), "The Day After Tomorrow", and recently "White House Down". While being criticized for his films being too long, over reliance on special effects, poor character development, and so on, Roland's films, to me, our truly massive and opens up the movie with a global initiative where the disasters he creates affects almost all of the Human species, which is clearly evident in 2012. I first fell in love with Roland's work when his most celebrated work, Independence Day; in which aliens attack the planet during the American holiday of Independence Day. I have seen many documentaries about the making of this movie and the difficult work and skill needed to produce such an epic, from model miniatures to shooting. ID4 has been credited for inaugurating the era of the disaster film that lead up to 2012 and continues to this day. Now, the movie!I first saw the trailers at my high school during lunch. I remember seeing the images of Los Vegas, the crumbling of the Christ the Redeemer statue and others back in the fall of 2009 when I moved back to Tallahassee from Apalachicola. I was certainly turned on by the sporadic clips of the movie but the LA scene DEFINATLY sealed opinion of the movie. I have never seen destruction of that scale and I would even say it rivals the destruction scene in ID4 where only the US Bank Tower was destroyed. In 2012, the mother of all earthquakes rips apart the West Coast in disaster scenes never before seen. So, on Saturday of November 13, 2009, I invited my dad (despite us not getting along), to see the film at the Tallahassee AMC 20 theater located in the former Tallahassee Mall. I was completely amazed, wowed, and even bought to tears by the movie. the sheer scale, situations, and movie length already suggested to me that this would be an EPIC film. I'm not here to narrate the film since I would assume everyone on this forum has seen the movie in its entirety but I am here to tell you what I got out of the film. The characters are rather well-explained and have taken their roles respectively. President Thomas Wilson (Danny Glover) is rather an ode to the accomplishment of Barack Obama who has been informed of the 2012 situation and his visibly concerned but not overly dramatic about it (since, the information of the end is being kept away from the public). The fact that, during the catastrophes, the President remained to address the nation one last time rather than board the arks in China speaks to his attribute of Humanity. Jackson Curtis (John Cusack) is a struggling father and holding odd jobs who is estranged from his ex-wife and kids but still manages to care and hold on to hope that he will one day be reunited with his family- a massive global event just so happen to set those wheels in motion. Adrian Helmsley (played by Chiwetel Ejiofor) takes is job vary seriously and in a way has been the voice of the Humanity through science, him being the one who knows the the disasters are about to happen much sooner than expected and collaborates with world leaders to save Humanity. Finally, Oliver Platt plays Chief of Staff Carl Anheuser, a rather snobbish individual who is only concern with control and power rather than love and compassion-in contrast to the humanitarian of Helmsley. I was wowed by the grand scale of the calamities at hand; massive earthquakes literally ripping apart continents, terrible volcanic eruptions, to massive tsunamis flooding every country, this movie is as close to slow-pace end-of-the-world as you can get (as opposed to "Knowing" which ends it all in one swift blow). The movie, thankfully,takes place in 2012 and the human race is going about their normal lives, unaware that most of them will be dead in a few days, note the playful chatter of the morning radio hosts in LA after an earthquake when we are first introduced to Jackson Curtis's character. This movie could have easily been set during or after the cataclysms and then the background development would have been absent, which would have made this movie less enjoyable. Due to the hysteria that would have enveloped the populace if knowledge of the disaster was made public, the governments of the world hold on to information to ensue a selected few survive. The disaster happens and its a struggle between the ones chosen to survive and everything else. Those in the disaster zone are obviously dead, those not there are scrambling to survive but know that their time is coming as whole civilizations are virtually wiped out. Those chosen to survive are now in charge of likely saving the human race from extinction despite being selected because of their checkbooks. Finally, the movie details the most single destructive event in modern earth history andcertainly human history,not even a large-scale nuclear war could compete with this, in my opinion. In many cases, the governments of the world have abandoned their people and let then fend for themselves, it shows whole cultures and societies being systematically destroyed; the fact that America, the sole superpower of the earth, ceases to exist after being ravaged by earthquakes, tsunamis, and the Yellowstone eruption and subsequent ash cloud. Indeed, the world has sure come to and end. One could only imagine families,couples, and even total strangers either fighting each other ore holding hands as they wait to die. Hell, i almost cried when President Wilson died when the U.S.S. John F. Kennedy hit the White House and along with billions of others. In addition, human greed and the dark side of Capitalism ultimately ensured that only a select few survived due to their financial situation, as opposed rather how they could contribute to a post-2012 world or not. I actually thought that the 2012 myth would happen in some form when during the 2011 Japanese earthquake and tsunami and the destructive 2011 tornado outbreak in the Midwestern United States. But, in 2012, had my first prom, I graduated from high school, and started college. The only thing that happened on December 21, 2012 was the movie "2012" in honor of the date, premiered on the FX Channel. Humanity breathed a sigh of relief. (Lol!) This movie is certainly ca classic and it should be treated as such.So what do you think?XOXOXOXOXIsiah
Reviewer: Nathan
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title: VFX showcase
Review: This movie is essentially just a showcase for VFX, but it has a really good story, plot, and acting. Horror movies donât scare me ever, no matter how gory or scares it has, but this movie and âthe day after tomorrowâ both scared me more than any other horror movie has. Something about disaster movies scare me, so I guess itâs irrational fear that gets me
Reviewer: Luis Costa
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title:
Review: Good film
Reviewer: Manuel
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title:
Review: esta pelicula ya tiene su tiempo pero con el 4K resaltan las imagenes y sonido.
Reviewer: SILVIO OJEDA TABASCO
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title:
Review: Llega en una empaque rÃgido y gran slipcover, ya que trae un disco extra de caracterÃsticas especiales.La calidad de la imagen es muy buena y el sonido dolby atmos excelente. Trae además audio en español y subtÃtulos en esos idiomas. El código digital es válido para Movies Anywhere válido solo para USA, lo malo es que solo está en inglés sin subtÃtulos. Lo recomiendo.
Reviewer: BO
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title:
Review: Ok product.
Reviewer: Maik
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title:
Review: Nachdem ich in meiner Rezension zu Independance Day 2 mit einem winzigen Hauch von Sarkasmus anmerkte, dass sich Roland Emmerich mit seinem furchtbaren Pathos wieder einmal selbst treu geblieben ist, bin ich ebenso erstaunt wie angetan, dass er sich in â2012â â ein Film aus dem Jahr 2009, auf den ich jetzt erst aufmerksam geworden bin - mal zwischendurch nicht treu geblieben ist. Denn da es hier â man möchte fast sagen: zum Glück â die ganze Welt erwischt, kann er die Vereinigten Staaten nicht zum Schluss mit wehendem Sternenbanner zum Hort der Glückseligkeit stilisieren, wo wieder einmal die Fäden zur Rettung des Planeten zusammenlaufen. Amerika gibt es nämlich nicht mehr.Dieser Film ist zur Abwechslung mal kein stupides Machwerk, wie manche Rezensenten meinen schimpfen zu müssen. Abgesehen von der etwas spinnerten Idee, die Sonne würde mit einer einzigen heftigen Eruption die Erde mittels Mikrowellen von innen aufheizen, wirft der Film einige Fragen mit ernsthaftem Hintergrund auf. Was wäre, wenn tatsächlich irgend eine Katastrophe die Erde zerstören würde? Wie würden wir uns verhalten? Und da ist Emmerich bewundernswert realistisch. Ich sehe in dem ganzen Film keine Handlung und kein Verhalten, wo ich sagen müsste: Sowas macht doch keiner. Das ganze denkbare Spektrum menschlicher Verhaltensweisen, die man ja auch aus den Berichten zum Untergang der Titanic kennt, ist vertreten und würde sich wohl auch genau so abspielen. Und nach welchem Prinzip wählt man die Leute aus, die auf die Archen kommen? Kontostand? Genpool? Lose ziehen? Das ist wirklich eine spannende Frage, die weit über ein bloÃes Weltuntergangsspektakel hinausreicht.Wunderbar zum Beispiel die Szene auf der Arche, wo sich Wissenschaftler Helmsley mit dem kommissarischen Regierungschef Anheuser eine Debatte über Moral und ZweckmäÃigkeit bei der Rettung von Menschenleben liefert. Die Dialoge stammen mal nicht aus der Worthülsenstanze und dem Phrasenautomaten, sondern sind durchdacht und lebensnah. Wenig Pathos, dafür sinnvolle Gedankengänge. Man ist immer wieder versucht, auf dem Cover nachzuschauen, ob dieser Film tatsächlich von Roland Emmerich ist und man sich nicht verlesen hat.Wer genau hinschaut, dem fallen hier und da auch interessante Metaphern auf. Wie zum Beispiel, als die Sixtinische Kapelle zusammenstürzt und die Risse durch Michelangelos Gemälde gehen. Es gibt da diese berühmte Gottesfunken-Szene an der Decke, wo der lasziv hingelümmelte Adam mit seinem Finger den Finger Gottes berührt. Der Riss in der Decke verläuft genau zwischen den beiden Fingern hindurch. Soll heiÃen: Die Bande zwischen Gott und dem Menschen wird gelöst, und Gott überlässt seine Schöpfung ihrem Schicksal. Oder wo ausgerechnet der Flugzeugträger John F. Kennedy aufâs WeiÃe Haus stürzt â Kennedy kehrt ins Oval Office zurück! (Emmerich sagt im Making-of auch, dass dieser Gedanke beim Zuschauer gewollt war.)Die Beziehungskiste zwischen Jackson Curtis, Kate Curtis und Gordon Silberman ist durchaus nachvollziehbar. Jedenfalls für den, der Trennung oder Scheidung hinter sich hat und sich in die Geschichte hineinversetzen kann. Die Kinder, die zwischen allen Beteiligten hin- und hergerissen und immer die Leidtragenden sind, sind sehr gut in die Story eingebaut. Was vermutlich nur den interessiert, der selbst welche hat. Zum Beispiel die kleine Lilly Curtis mit ihrem Mützen-Tick. Hat mit der Handlung gar nichts zu tun, aber solche Kleinigkeiten sind es, die einen Film aus den rein visuellen Spektakeln herausheben, weil sie ihn menschlich machen. Da hat offensichtlich jemand weiter gedacht als nur bis zur nächsten Explosion. Ãberhaupt bin ich überrascht, wie realistisch und nicht ohne Witz die zwischenmenschlichen Beziehungen in diesem Katastrophenfilm herausmodelliert sind â für einen Emmerich-Film absolut ungewohnt. Herrlich die Szene, wo Silberman im Supermarkt zu Kate sagt: Zwischen uns gibt es einen Graben, und in dem Moment reiÃt die Erde zwischen ihnen auf. Hätte mir an Silbermans Stelle zu denken gegeben ..!Als überaus angenehm empfinde ich, dass der amerikanische Präsident hier keine Klischee-Figur ist und nicht als eine Mischung aus Captain America und Superman dargestellt wird, sondern einfach nur als Mensch. Seine letzten Gedanken, bevor der Flugzeugträger auf ihn stürzt, sind bei seiner Frau. Menschlich, pathosfrei, schön.Ich hatte erwartet, wieder mal ânurâ ein sehenswertes Krach-Bumm-Spektakel mit überwältigenden Spezialeffekten zu sehen und bin wirklich und aufrichtig überrascht, wie realitätsnah und lebensecht die Story einschlieÃlich der Charaktere in diesem Katastrophenrahmen ist. Dass sich in dem Film ein Cliffhanger an den anderen reiht, ist okay. Dafür ist es ein Ãktschn-Spektakel. Aber dass Emmerich auch anders kann als nur klebriges Pathos, und das schon im Jahr 2009, verblüfft mich dann doch. Da kann ich glatt mal fünf Sterne für einen Emmerich-Streifen vergeben. Ich hätte nichts dagegen, wenn Roland Emmerich sich öfter mal selbst untreu werden würde.