Price: $22.41
(as of Dec 03, 2024 11:40:15 UTC - Details)

An Amazon Brand. Amazon Basics 16-Pack AA Rechargeable Batteries, Recharge up to 400x, High-Capacity 2400 mAh, Pre-Charged
RELIABLE PERFORMANCE: 16-pack of AA rechargeable NiMH batteries (2,400 mAh)
DEVICE COMPATIBLE: Ideal for devices with high power or continuous drain like game controllers, wireless devices, toys, and more
LONG LASTING: Can be recharged up to 400 times with minimal power loss
LOW SELF DISCHARGE: Maintains 50% capacity for 1 year
EASY USE & STORAGE: Has a shelf-life up to 5 years for everyday or emergency use; arrives pre-charged and ready to use
Reviewer: V.
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title: GOOD PRICE!
Review: Very well boxed/sealed. I have never had a problem with purchasing different brands of recyclable batteries from Amazon. I will change rating if I find these do not perform as well. All of the other ones I purchased over the last 5 years are still going strong via my battery charger.I put 2 of these in my TV remote directly out of box. *photo 2) Only 2 green bars showed capacity. I decided to put them in my charger. Light went from red to green in appx. 1.5 hours. I put them back into remote and green bars on TV showed 4 bars! (photo 3)Just a reminder. Even though they are charged before packing at factory, they will lose some power before they are finally sold and shipped to you. To get FULL power the 1st time, I would suggest you charge them again.

Reviewer: Travis M.
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title: Extremely consistent performance, holds more charge than advertised, great value
Review: I recently purchased EBL's 2500 AA NiMH batteries (ASIN B08XP7ZC8K) because they were less expensive, advertised 2500mAh capacity, and were 30% less expensive (as of May 2024), and I liked the colors. Since it seemed a little too good to be true, I decided to thoroughly test and compare the brands. The data is worth sharing.Testing Methodology: All tests were performed with an ISDT N16 charger. It is an intelligent charger. Two rounds of testing were performed at three charge rates: 0.5A, 1.0A, 1.5A. The NiMH charging strategy starts with a lower voltage and increases the voltage over time and considers temperature as it charges, up to the set charge rate. "Activation Charge" for NiMH cells was enabled, which drains the battery first, then performs a full charge. This should result in a consistent charge pattern (no partial charges) and level the playing field as discharging was uniform. The charted results omit the single worst charge, while the table includes all results. The batteries have not been used in anything other than the ISDT N16 charger.Results:* All cells charged to roughly 2574mAh on average, at all charge rates* The product exceeds advertised 2400mAh capacity by 174mAh, on average, at all charge rates.* At a 1.5A charge rate, the charge variation between the least & most charged cells was the greatest* At a 0.5A charge rate, the variation was the lowestComparing this to EBL's offering, Amazon's 2400mAh battery had a tendency to exceed the stated design capacity, which I've observed as between 2562-2580mAh on average and as high as 2848mAh. This, from the same charger, at the same charge rates, and with the "activation" option enabled.Cost comparison (as of May 2024) highlights some interesting data:* AZ 2400 12-pk @ $21.79 - $1.82/cell - @2574mAh realized capacity = 0.07 cents per 100mAh* EBL 2500 12-pk - $15.28 - $1.27/cell - @2100mAh realized capacity = 0.06 cents per 100mAh* Capacity as deciding factor: Amazon "wins" as they hold 18% more charge, but initial purchase cost is 30% more than EBL. When considering cost per cell's capacity, the difference is negligible and both brands stand on equal footing. Amazon's brand charges more consistently, holds more charge/out-performs their stated specification, and has more consistent voltage at rest.* Cost as deciding factor: EBL "wins" on price as the initial purchase cost is less expensive than Amazon by 30%. However, EBL's cells hold 18% less charge than Amazon and fall short of charging to EBL's stated capacity by 16%. If EBL's cells charged more consistently and could be fully charged to capacity, they would easily represent the better overall value.* Charging: EBLs perform better at a higher 1.5A charge rate and also charge more quickly. Amazon's batteries perform better at a 0.5A charge rate which takes longer. However, Amazon's variability at 1.5A charging (360mAh variance) is only *slightly* worse than the best EBL 1.5A result (324mAh variance). EBL's variance at 0.5A charge rate is 644mAh, which is 2.25x worse than Amazon at 287mAh variance. Amazon's product performance is consistently consistent.

Reviewer: Linda G Stephens
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title: These are a MUST for every household!
Review: These rechargeable batteries are awesome and are actually BETTER than advertised. They are long lasting, recharge quickly and retain the charge for a lengthy amount of time,Amazon Basics 16-Count Rechargeable AA NiMH Batteries, 2000 mAh, Recharge up to 1000x Times and come to you Pre-Charged. At first I ordered the 16-count package, but kept finding so many uses that I quickly ordered another package and shared with my grandchildren! These batteries are one of the most satisfying purchases I have ever made on Amazon.

Reviewer: Barbara Winski
Rating: 4.0 out of 5 stars
Title: Size difference
Review: Already owned some but needed more because regular batteries I had in my back massager died and didn't have any backups left. Not a loss since I really needed more anyway but, I was kind of pissed to find out that these batteries are a pinch bigger than regular ones and they wouldn't fit in the battery compartment. So now I have to get regular ones too. Decent batteries but don't get on an ASAP just in case they don't fit everything you need them for.Other than this one item, they've fit and work just fine. Have had to recharge them and don't take much time to do that. They seem to keep a charge a shorter time then regular batteries but that could be my usage also. I have had name brand rechargeable in the past that seemed to keep the charge longer though.

Reviewer: Skiingsailor
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title: Great batteries for a great price
Review: I've had these batteries for a year now at least and have been very happy with their performance. I would also say they're charging longevity has been fairly decent and certainly for the price Amazon is charging.They're very easy to use and come with a great charger just plug it into the wall they'll charge up the light will go green when they're done.They've been great to have around and certainly to be a little bit more environmentally friendly rather than using disposable batteries. I've been very happy and I would highly recommend purchasing these batteries.

Reviewer: Antonio S.
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title:
Review: Retienen bien la carga, son muy funcionales

Reviewer: IVAN
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title:
Review: Muy buen producto , dura la carga en los controles de televisión y en juguetes de niños

Reviewer: Zsolt Horvath
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title:
Review: It is a good battery. It only does what a battery suppose to do. Nothing more nothing less. Just a battery.

Reviewer: Angel A.
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title:
Review: Las pilas AA recargables de Amazon Basics son una opción práctica y económica para dispositivos de uso frecuente, como controles remotos, cámaras, linternas, y juguetes. Con una capacidad de alrededor de 2000 mAh (para el modelo estándar), ofrecen una buena duración de carga, y se destacan por su ciclo de vida prolongado, soportando cientos de recargas sin una pérdida significativa de rendimiento.Ventajas: • Buena capacidad: Tienen una capacidad respetable que proporciona una duración adecuada para la mayoría de los dispositivos. • Ciclos de recarga: Su durabilidad permite recargarlas hasta 1000 veces. • Costo: Son asequibles y tienen una buena relación calidad-precio en comparación con otras marcas. • Bajo efecto memoria: Mantienen su carga incluso cuando no se usan por periodos prolongados.Desventajas: • Pérdida de carga en almacenamiento: Aunque son de baja autodescarga, después de varios meses sin uso pueden perder parte de su capacidad. • Tiempo de carga: Dependiendo del cargador, pueden tardar varias horas en recargarse completamente.En resumen, son una opción sólida para quienes buscan pilas AA recargables confiables y de bajo costo para dispositivos de uso diario.

Reviewer: Scorpion3
Rating: 5.0 out of 5 stars
Title:
Review: Ich benutze die Amazon Basics AA-Batterien (2400 mAh) nun schon seit Jahren in verschiedenen Geräten und bin absolut überzeugt. Egal ob in der Fernbedienung, meinem Heizkörperthermostat oder sogar in den VR-Controllern, diese Akkus liefern stets eine konstante und verlässliche Leistung.Die hohe Kapazität von 2400 mAh sorgt dafür, dass ich die Batterien nicht ständig wechseln muss. Besonders bei Geräten, die viel Energie verbrauchen, wie den VR-Controllern, fällt das auf – hier halten sie um einiges länger als herkömmliche Batterien. Auch in der Fernbedienung funktionieren sie hervorragend und bleiben oft monatelang im Einsatz, ohne nachgeladen werden zu müssen.Was ich besonders schätze, ist die schnelle Ladezeit. In Kombination mit einem guten Ladegerät sind sie in wenigen Stunden wieder einsatzbereit. Ich lade sie meist über Nacht, sodass sie morgens wieder komplett voll sind. Dadurch hat man immer frische Batterien zur Hand, was wirklich praktisch ist.Auch nach vielen Ladezyklen zeigen die Batterien keinerlei Anzeichen von Verschleiß. Die Leistung bleibt konstant, und sie verlieren nicht an Kapazität. Das macht sie nicht nur umweltfreundlich, sondern auch kosteneffizient, da man sie immer wieder verwenden kann, anstatt regelmäßig neue Batterien zu kaufen.Für den Preis ist das 12er-Pack ein echter Schnapper, und ich würde sie jederzeit weiterempfehlen – besonders für Vielnutzer von Geräten wie Fernbedienungen, Spielzeug oder Controllern, die oft im Einsatz sind.